About This Article
The article discusses U.S. state laws for response to intervention (RTI). According to the author, RTI is considered to be more effective than the severe discrepancy approach when assessing student eligibility for special education. Topics include an overview of the specific learning disabilities (SLD) procedures outlined in the 2004 Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), which no longer requires severe discrepancy approaches in determining SLD eligibility. An in-depth examination of the relevant state laws regarding state education agency (SEA) guidelines, including RTI, response to IDEA regulations, and research-based alternatives in education is also presented.
APA Citation: Zirkel, P., & Thomas, L. (2010). State laws for RTI: An updated snapshot. Teaching Exceptional Children, 42(3), 56-63.
Author: Zirkel, Perry A.; Thomas, Lisa B.
Title: State Laws for RTI: An Updated Snapshot
Journal: Teaching Exceptional Children
Publisher: Council for Exceptional Children
Is this article copyrighted?
NICHCY expresses its appreciation to the Council for Exceptional Children for its generous permission to post this article on our website.
While material produced by NICHCY is copyright free, this article is not. The original publisher of this article, the Council for Exceptional Children, holds the copyright to the article, whether in print or electronic form. You may view, download, print, or save the article’s content for the purposes of research, teaching, and/or private study. Please do not reproduce, post, redistribute, sell, modify, or create a derivative work of this content without prior, express written permission of the publisher.
For permission to reprint or copy this article, contact the Council for Exceptional Children, 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 1000, Arlington, VA 22202-3557. Phone: 888-232-7733.